Skip to content
Housing associations & local authorities

Thousands of doors. One regulator. No margin for a gap.

Social housing carries the heaviest fire door obligation in the country and the tightest constraints on meeting it. Quarterly communal checks, annual flat entrance door checks, a safety case for every high-rise, a regulator with real consumer standards behind it — and a capital programme that was set before any of it.

Calculate your saving

75%

of UK fire doors fail inspection

Source to confirm

Quarterly

communal door checks required

Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022

Annual

flat entrance door checks required

Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022

Sector challenges

What actually goes wrong here

01

Access is the whole problem

A flat entrance door you cannot get to is a compliance gap you cannot close. No-access rates of 20–30% on first attempt are normal, and each repeat visit costs money and produces nothing.

02

Evidence sits in four systems

Inspection contractor, repairs contractor, housing management system, and a shared drive. Assembling one auditable record per door is a manual exercise repeated every time someone asks.

03

The remedial backlog compounds

Faults found at inspection go into a repairs queue. By the time they are attended the defect has grown, and the door that needed a hinge now needs replacing.

04

Scrutiny is permanent now

The Building Safety Act, the Regulator’s consumer standards, tenant satisfaction measures and the coroner’s courts. Compliance is no longer something demonstrated annually.

Why Parilon

What changes for housing associations

One visit per door, then it reports itself

Access is still needed once, to fit. After that the door’s condition is known continuously without anyone getting back into the property.

A single auditable record

Every event, inspection, repair and replacement against the door, in one place, attributable to a named responsible person.

Faults caught while they are cheap

Continuous data means a defect is found in the week it appears, not in the quarter it is discovered — which is where the remedial saving comes from.

Safety case evidence, generated

For high-rise buildings the door element of the safety case is produced from live data rather than reconstructed from files.

Case study
“We had four contractors, three spreadsheets and no way of answering a simple question: is every fire door in this building working right now? Six weeks after fitting Parilon we could answer it in one screen.”
HA

Name to confirm Placeholder

Head of Building Safety, regional housing provider

Read the full case study
Questions

Asked by people in your sector

These carry FAQPage schema on every sector page — the AEO objective, applied where the questions actually get asked.

Continuous monitoring produces the record the regulations require you to keep, and Parilon generates the quarterly and annual returns from it. The legal duty remains with the responsible person — what changes is that the evidence exists without a separate exercise to create it.
The same way you do today, but once rather than annually. We work with your existing access process and the register records the exposure explicitly, so no-access doors are visible rather than quietly missing.
The device records the door’s physical state — closed, open, closing profile, impact. It does not record who passes through it, when residents are home, audio or images. Being explicit about that in tenant communications is the single biggest factor in access rates.

Talk to someone who has done this in social housing.

Thirty minutes, the live platform, and your estate’s numbers.